1. implementation schedule

May 14, 2025 - February 4, 2026 (55 days)

Number of schools, number of students, etc.

Number of schools

102Schools (online classes)101(2 schools, 2 on-site classes)

*Traveling classes were held at special needs schools.

*One of the special needs schools conducted classes for each educational program. The number of schools that participated in both online classes and on-site classes overlaps, so the total number of schools is the sum of the total number of schools.102It will be a school.

Number of participants

5,877 (online classes)5,8542 persons, on-site classes23(Name)

(Breakdown)

［Online classes]

elementary school3student in ... year7162 persons, elementary school4student in ... year5,0872 students, double-entry classes (elementary school)3interpoint (interword separation)4(Grade 2)62 persons, elementary school5student in ... year412 persons, Special Needs School High School4name

［Traveling to the classroom.]

Special Needs School Elementary82 persons, middle school122 persons, High School3name

　Number of pre-briefing sessions]

20Times (online classes)18(1 time, 2 times as on-site class)

*The pre-session briefing was conducted in the same way as the actual class.

　Number of times classes have been held

113Times (online classes)109(1 time, 4 times as on-site class)

For schools with four or more classes per grade level, classes were divided into multiple sessions.

3. implementation overview

This fiscal year102The program was conducted at the school. In the online class, students were able to watch a video introducing the museum, learn about the museum'sVRThe class included "Experiencing Images" and "Interactive Appreciation Using Works from the Museum's Collection (Still Images)". In addition to the content of the online class, the on-site class incorporated the experience of touching replicas of paintings and sculptures and a visual experience using life-size tapestries of sculptures.

The pre-session briefing was basically held online at the same time for several schools that were offering online classes in the same month. Schools that were unable to meet the dates and times specified by the museum were accommodated on an individual basis. For all schools that were scheduled for on-site classes, we visited the schools to discuss the class content and confirm the class location.

4. survey results

1. Sohyo (General Council of Trade Unions of Japan)
   Regarding "participation satisfaction" in the teacher survey, 88% of the respondents were satisfied with the online class and 100% with the on-site class. The online museum tour was a good opportunity for children to experience art, and some children commented that they actually visited museums as a result of the class and that they would like to use it as a reference in their art appreciation instruction.
2. About Content
   In the "introductory video, VR video, and viewing video" section of the faculty survey, more than 87% of the respondents in the online class and 100% of the respondents in the on-site class indicated that they were satisfied. A "replica" was used in the on-site class. Faculty satisfaction with the replica was 100%.
   especiallyVRSeveral commented that children enjoyed the museum tour and increased their interest in the artwork during the video experience.
3. Museum Response
   Regarding the "museum's response" to the teacher survey, 88% of the respondents in the online class and 100% of the respondents in the on-site class were satisfied with the museum's response. Favorable comments were seen regarding the way the museum staff conducted the classes and interacted with the children. The advance briefing sessions and explanations in the manual were also favorably received. Note that in some schools where equipment was adjusted during the class, it took some time to adjust the equipment. In the next and subsequent years, we would like to make the pre-setup and operation of the equipment as well known as possible at the pre-briefing sessions and in the manuals.